Thursday, July 26, 2012
Modeling Comprehension
Speed vs Content
In Rasinki's 2004 article, "Creating Fluent Readers," he points out that some schools are pushing for speed while reading. I have seen some of this phenomenon, where speed is favored over content. It does not seem to be effective especially when considering grades that use standardized testing. While it may be helpful for the children to read a passage quickly for a test, the questions usually focus on the content of a piece. This means that the children have to read and reread the passage for each new question, wasting perhaps more time than they would have if they had carefully read the passage the first time.
Thursday, July 19, 2012
The Power of Words
In the Yopp and Yopp (2007) article, they mentioned that it is important to create a classroom environment that promotes word consciousness. I have seen classrooms use a special word wall or a big words chart to point out and promote the use of uncommon words that are used by the students. I believe it is important to remind the children of these words as they are writing and reading. Simply displaying the words in the classroom is not enough. We need to be conscious of the fact that talking about the words the children are using is just as important. Showing your own enthusiasm when encountering new and different words is a key component in raising the level of enthusiasm the children attain. It is important then that we model the process, and share our own thoughts with the children. In Cunningham and Cunningham's 1992 article they spoke of how making words can be important in children's development of phonemic awareness. Here again, modeling the process is key. Bring in words that you have struggled with, explain to the children the steps you took to better understand the word. That could mean a way you learned to spell the word or even steps you took to derive the meaning of the word. This allows the children to see that learning continues throughout life, that there are words that can sometimes even stump the teacher.
Pinterest has several ways to "build words," but I thought that this one was very interesting. Using building blocks to literally build the words in a lesson.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
Coaching
One of the articles that I chose to read was Clark's 2004 article encouraging the use of coaching children while they read. In my own experience and in the experience of others, the phrase "sound it out" is frequently used when helping young children learn to read. It was interesting to see different ways of presenting the same idea to the children without using this same phrase. While we all may know that children sometimes use pictures to help them recognize a word, or that children may break the word up into parts, we sometimes forget to step back and look not at the whole word but at it's parts and contextual clues surrounding the word. Simply reminding the child that words can be broken up into parts could alleviate any stress or anxiety the child has while needing to "sound out" an entire word. Clark offered specific phrases and strategies that teachers can use to replace the "sound it out" method. I often jumped right to giving the children clues about the word, forgetting that it is also important to allow the child time to think through how to figure an unfamiliar word out. The idea of having the child think about how to solve this dilemma is not a new one, but I believe it is one that is frequently overlooked by myself and others.
While thinking of something interesting to include with this post, I came across Joanne Meier's blog, Sound it Out. While her blog is not specifically about the "sound it out" phenomenon, some of her posts have been very interesting to review.
While thinking of something interesting to include with this post, I came across Joanne Meier's blog, Sound it Out. While her blog is not specifically about the "sound it out" phenomenon, some of her posts have been very interesting to review.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Changing our View
In Bell and Jarvis's 2002 article, it was interesting to see how they both incorporated research about how children learn to read and write into their classrooms. As future educators, we are always discussing activities that we can incorporate in the classroom to promote literacy but rarely have the opportunity to let our ideas play out. All that we may envision is difficult to truly imagine until we have that opportunity to test our theories, to put into practice the ides and activities that we think would most benefit the children. In the article, I was excited to see how the research had influenced the views that the teachers had of children. This idea that children come into a classroom already being a reader and writer seems logical, but at the same time, we teach as if most children have never been exposed to either idea. Beginning to see our students as readers and writers can give them power and confidence coming in to our classroom. Celebrating what they know and showing the children ways in which they have already mastered some of the learning concepts can have such an impact on how a child sees him or herself. This idea they presented, that learning does not happen in singular instructions periods is fascinating, for instance, changing the way we teach children about letters. Taking a more holistic approach to words, learning letters and their sounds without drilling one letter at a time, can be a more exciting and innovative way to teach our students.
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Disconnect in Effectiveness
Of all the readings, I found Allington's Effective Reading Instruction (2002) to be the most interesting. The six "T's" that identify exemplary teachers, hopefully, are what each of us strive for in our own teaching, helping the students get the most out of a lesson, while keeping the material interesting and engaging to the student. Most schools today have a set curriculum and schedule allowing little to no variance. While Allington's ideas are ideal, in a classroom today, they might not always be possible. Not every school has the resources or variance in schedule to provide the children with a "let me demonstrate" approach. I believe this style of teaching can be very beneficial, but in some schools today it may not be seen as the most beneficial way to teach. The use of scripted curriculum takes away from a teacher's opportunity to provide more for his or her students.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)